7 results for 'cat:"Arbitration" AND cat:"Employment Discrimination" AND cat:"Employment Retaliation"'.
J. Cronan grants Starbucks' motion to compel arbitration in an employment discrimination and retaliation suit filed by a barista. The barista claims he does not recall signing the arbitration agreement, but that is insufficient to create a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether he signed the document, particularly given that he admits to filling out electronic paperwork when he was hired.
Court: USDC Southern District of New York, Judge: Cronan, Filed On: May 28, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv6951, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: arbitration, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
Per curiam, the appellate division finds that the lower court properly declined to vacate an arbitration award granted for employment discrimination and retaliation under the Federal Arbitration Act. The arbitrator clearly analyzed the evidence in a detailed and typical way and was not required to address every possible theory of discrimination. The retaliation claim comes down to credibility determinations that should generally not be reviewed on appeal. Affirmed.
Court: New York Appellate Divisions, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: May 21, 2024, Case #: 02788, Categories: arbitration, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Bennett grants Sherwin-Williams’ motion to compel arbitration and stay of the proceedings in this employment dispute brought by a former paint mixer who alleges race discrimination based on a failure to rehire claim. The paint mixer argues that the arbitration agreement was outside of the scope of his claims and not valid. The court found the arbitration agreement to be valid and enforceable, delegating the threshold issue of arbitrability to the arbitrator.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Bennett, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv3190, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: arbitration, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Chuang grants a bank’s motion to dismiss and compel arbitration on a former worker’s race discrimination, age discrimination, retaliation and contract claims arising when she was terminated. There is no dispute that the former employee’s claims are arbitrable.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Chuang, Filed On: October 18, 2023, Case #: 8:23cv643, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: arbitration, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free